// process chunks
The subtlety: They had utilities which would produced formatted Basic listings and they would give example output of these utlities in their ads and catalogs. It was quite a while before I realized that most of those examples were not program excerpts, but complete programs which of course contained the Beagle Bros signature weirdness. And then there were the seemingly innocent hex dumps. My favorite was from the cover of one of their catalogs, which had a classic picture of this fellow sitting in a chair. On the floor next to him is a handbag with a piece of tractor paper sticking out. On the paper is a hex dump: 48 45 4C 50 21 20 and so on, which are ASCII codes that spell out the message: “HELP! GET ME OUT! I’M TRAPPED IN HERE!----SOPHIE”，详情可参考搜狗输入法2026
，推荐阅读Safew下载获取更多信息
年度征文｜2025 年育儿手记：从家到幼儿园
In recent years, LLMs have shown significant improvements in their overall performance. When they first became mainstream a couple of years before, they were already impressive with their seemingly human-like conversation abilities, but their reasoning always lacked. They were able to describe any sorting algorithm in the style of your favorite author; on the other hand, they weren't able to consistently perform addition. However, they improved significantly, and it's more and more difficult to find examples where they fail to reason. This created the belief that with enough scaling, LLMs will be able to learn general reasoning.，更多细节参见91视频
Cyrillic homoglyphs: the real threat